This is for commentary, articles and discussion of anything across Jared's tech network. Since the network has different things, it can all still fit here on the blog.
I found an email in my regular inbox that immediately made me wonder what was going on. It was written in French. Why was a stranger contacting me in a language I don’t normally use for correspondence? I looked at the addresses and noticed that the sender’s Gmail address was different from the Outlook address where replies were supposed to go.
Before asking ChatGPT to analyze anything, I ran the French message through Google Translate so I could understand what it actually said. My coffee-fueled brain may initially have heard or thought “crypto,” given how often cryptocurrency turns up in scams these days. But neither the original message nor Google’s translation mentions cryptocurrency. The proposal is simply an unsolicited offer involving “23 million” in an unspecified currency.
Original French email:
,
Bonjour,
Je suis opérateur économique. Je dispose de 23.M.que je souhaite vous confier pour placer dans des projets rentables ainsi que dans des projets visant les personnes défavorisées.
Merci de répondre pour plus d’infos svp.
Mr Daniel
11/09/2026 «»
English translation supplied by Google Translate:
,
Hello,
I am an economic operator. I have 23 million [currency unspecified] that I
wish to entrust to you for investment in profitable projects,
as well as in projects aimed at helping disadvantaged individuals.
Please respond for further information.
Mr. Daniel
11/09/2026 “”
What caught my attention
The From header displayed “Mr DANIEL” but used . The Reply-To header directed responses to . A different reply address is not automatically malicious, but here it accompanies an unexplained offer of an enormous sum of money from a stranger who gives no identifiable business, surname, financial documentation, or reason for contacting me.
The email was delivered to my inbox, not the junk folder. Its headers show SpamAssassin assigned a score of 3.0 against a threshold of 5.0. The authentication results recorded a passing Gmail DKIM check and SPF_PASS in the spam report. Those checks can authenticate the sending infrastructure or domain without proving that the person or financial proposal is legitimate.
The message headers also show submission through Gmail’s authenticated SMTP service from a computer identifying itself as DESKTOP-N40NJ4M. That alone does not tell us who was operating the computer or where the person was located. The message had an HTML body; the attached source did not show an external link or file attachment.
Why I am suspicious
This resembles the opening of a financial confidence or advance-fee scam: a stranger makes a vague, extravagant offer and asks the recipient to reply for details. That is a risk assessment, not proof of the sender’s identity or the specific next step. No actual request for fees or financial records appears in this first message.
My reaction? Do they really think I haven’t seen these kinds of approaches before? The language choice got my attention, but the details were what made me stop. Translation tools helped me understand the content; checking the addresses and headers helped me evaluate it. ChatGPT was a later second opinion, not my first line of defense.
ChatGPT can be useful for examining email headers and explaining technical details that aren’t always obvious. I have experience reading headers myself, but I sometimes want a second opinion on SpamAssassin’s results. That’s why I gave ChatGPT a text file containing the email and asked it to examine the details.
I’ve seen suspicious emails before
This is hardly my first encounter with questionable email. On July 21, 2026, I wrote about a Spanish-language message that claimed to be from a new accountant and used a display name referencing my own domain, while the real sending address belonged to an unrelated domain. That message even included a suspicious .pdf.uue attachment and passed SPF and DKIM checks. Like Mr. Daniel’s message, it reached my inbox despite warning signs. The difference is that the July message sought invoice and banking confirmation; this French message offers a mysterious fortune and asks me to respond.
On August 22, 2025, I complained about unsolicited messages using Re: subject lines and claiming to be waiting for a response about supposed website problems. The emails tried to make a conversation appear to exist where I hadn’t initiated one. Mr. Daniel uses a different hook, but the goal of getting me to reply to an unsolicited approach is familiar.
And on March 25, 2024, I described an unsolicited electric-bike sales pitch sent to two addresses, complete with repeated marketing copy and a peculiar instruction to provide my email address to be removed from their list. That wasn’t the same kind of financial proposal, but it raised the same question: why should I engage with someone who approached me out of nowhere and whose message doesn’t make sense in context?
A message can pass technical email authentication and still be suspicious. A spam filter can assign warning points without reaching its junk threshold. And an offer of millions from an unidentified stranger does not become credible just because it is politely written in French.
I won’t reply to this unsolicited offer. I’ll keep the original email and its headers privately as supporting evidence. I’ve chosen to show the addresses involved in this article so readers can understand what caught my attention. My address, , appears in nine entries in the Have I Been Pwned results I reviewed. Those entries include account breaches, exposed databases, spam lists and credential-stuffing data. Here are the names and dates, in reverse chronological order:
April 2025: Synthient Credential Stuffing Threat Data – aggregated credential-stuffing lists containing email addresses and passwords from earlier breaches.
September 2021: Epik – domain registration and hosting data, including scraped WHOIS records.
March 2020: Lead Hunter – an exposed collection of personal information.
October 2019: Data Enrichment Exposure From PDL Customer – personal and professional profile data on an unsecured server.
February 2019: Verifications.io – exposed email-validation data; HIBP says no passwords were included.
July 2017: B2B USA Businesses – a corporate contact and spam list.
January 2017: River City Media Spam List – a large collection of email addresses and other contact data used in spam operations.
October 2013: Adobe – account information, including passwords and password hints.
July 2012: Dropbox – account credentials, including hashed passwords.
These are the incident descriptions and data categories reported by HIBP, not proof that every listed category of information about me was exposed in each incident. They also do not establish how Mr. Daniel obtained my address.
Different languages, different pretexts, and different requests. The common thread is that I read the details instead of accepting the story at face value.
Bye bye, Mr. Daniel. Nice knowing you. Thanks for writing in a language I had to translate.
23 Million, Two Email Addresses, and One Very Suspicious Message
I found an email in my regular inbox that immediately made me wonder what was going on. It was written in French. Why was a stranger contacting me in a language I don’t normally use for correspondence? I looked at the addresses and noticed that the sender’s Gmail address was different from the Outlook address where replies were supposed to go.
Before asking ChatGPT to analyze anything, I ran the French message through Google Translate so I could understand what it actually said. My coffee-fueled brain may initially have heard or thought “crypto,” given how often cryptocurrency turns up in scams these days. But neither the original message nor Google’s translation mentions cryptocurrency. The proposal is simply an unsolicited offer involving “23 million” in an unspecified currency.
Original French email:
Bonjour,
Je suis opérateur économique. Je dispose de 23.M.que je souhaite vous confier pour placer dans des projets rentables ainsi que dans des projets visant les personnes défavorisées.
Merci de répondre pour plus d’infos svp.
Mr Daniel
11/09/2026 «»
English translation supplied by Google Translate:
,
Hello,
I am an economic operator. I have 23 million [currency unspecified] that I
wish to entrust to you for investment in profitable projects,
as well as in projects aimed at helping disadvantaged individuals.
Please respond for further information.
Mr. Daniel
11/09/2026 “”
What caught my attention
The From header displayed “Mr DANIEL” but used . The Reply-To header directed responses to . A different reply address is not automatically malicious, but here it accompanies an unexplained offer of an enormous sum of money from a stranger who gives no identifiable business, surname, financial documentation, or reason for contacting me.
The email was delivered to my inbox, not the junk folder. Its headers show SpamAssassin assigned a score of 3.0 against a threshold of 5.0. The authentication results recorded a passing Gmail DKIM check and SPF_PASS in the spam report. Those checks can authenticate the sending infrastructure or domain without proving that the person or financial proposal is legitimate.
The message headers also show submission through Gmail’s authenticated SMTP service from a computer identifying itself as DESKTOP-N40NJ4M. That alone does not tell us who was operating the computer or where the person was located. The message had an HTML body; the attached source did not show an external link or file attachment.
Why I am suspicious
This resembles the opening of a financial confidence or advance-fee scam: a stranger makes a vague, extravagant offer and asks the recipient to reply for details. That is a risk assessment, not proof of the sender’s identity or the specific next step. No actual request for fees or financial records appears in this first message.
My reaction? Do they really think I haven’t seen these kinds of approaches before? The language choice got my attention, but the details were what made me stop. Translation tools helped me understand the content; checking the addresses and headers helped me evaluate it. ChatGPT was a later second opinion, not my first line of defense.
ChatGPT can be useful for examining email headers and explaining technical details that aren’t always obvious. I have experience reading headers myself, but I sometimes want a second opinion on SpamAssassin’s results. That’s why I gave ChatGPT a text file containing the email and asked it to examine the details.
I’ve seen suspicious emails before
This is hardly my first encounter with questionable email. On July 21, 2026, I wrote about a Spanish-language message that claimed to be from a new accountant and used a display name referencing my own domain, while the real sending address belonged to an unrelated domain. That message even included a suspicious .pdf.uue attachment and passed SPF and DKIM checks. Like Mr. Daniel’s message, it reached my inbox despite warning signs. The difference is that the July message sought invoice and banking confirmation; this French message offers a mysterious fortune and asks me to respond.
On August 22, 2025, I complained about unsolicited messages using Re: subject lines and claiming to be waiting for a response about supposed website problems. The emails tried to make a conversation appear to exist where I hadn’t initiated one. Mr. Daniel uses a different hook, but the goal of getting me to reply to an unsolicited approach is familiar.
And on March 25, 2024, I described an unsolicited electric-bike sales pitch sent to two addresses, complete with repeated marketing copy and a peculiar instruction to provide my email address to be removed from their list. That wasn’t the same kind of financial proposal, but it raised the same question: why should I engage with someone who approached me out of nowhere and whose message doesn’t make sense in context?
The takeaway
A message can pass technical email authentication and still be suspicious. A spam filter can assign warning points without reaching its junk threshold. And an offer of millions from an unidentified stranger does not become credible just because it is politely written in French.
I won’t reply to this unsolicited offer. I’ll keep the original email and its headers privately as supporting evidence. I’ve chosen to show the addresses involved in this article so readers can understand what caught my attention. My address, , appears in nine entries in the Have I Been Pwned results I reviewed. Those entries include account breaches, exposed databases, spam lists and credential-stuffing data. Here are the names and dates, in reverse chronological order:
These are the incident descriptions and data categories reported by HIBP, not proof that every listed category of information about me was exposed in each incident. They also do not establish how Mr. Daniel obtained my address.
Related reading:
Different languages, different pretexts, and different requests. The common thread is that I read the details instead of accepting the story at face value.
Bye bye, Mr. Daniel. Nice knowing you. Thanks for writing in a language I had to translate.
Regards:
The Email address you wrote to
Share this:
Like this:
Related
Discover more from Jared's Technology podcast network
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Published in musings and security news and commentary